ArticleJACC. Asia2025
The Effect of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Coronary Artery Perforation.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A practical approach to the management of percutaneous coronary intervention complications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Perforation Treated With Covered Stents: The Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance in a Contemporary Cohort.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Impact of Nonadherence to Any Antiplatelet Therapy After PCI With Drug-Eluting Stents on Critical Outcomes.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Article
- Perforations in Complex PCI: Accepting the Risk, Minimizing the Harm With Intracoronary Imaging.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravascular imaging (IVI) complements coronary angiography and may help prevent coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objectives: The authors evaluated whether IVI-guided PCI is associated with a lower risk of PCI-related CAP in a real-world cohort. Methods: This observational study analyzed consecutive PCI procedures from January 2006 to October 2023. The procedures were divided into 4 groups according to the year performed: 2006 to 2010 (P1), 2011 to 2015 (P2), 2016 to 2020 (P3), and 2021 to 2023 (P4). We evaluated the trend of IVI-guided PCI and the incidence of CAP. A mixed effects logistic model was employed to assess their relationship. Results: CAP occurred in 368 (1.6%) of 22,368 PCIs. IVI-guided PCI accounted for 63% of all cases, of which 95% were intravascular ultrasound procedures. From P1 to P3, the ratio of IVI-guided PCI increased linearly (P1: 30%, P2: 61%, P3: 93%, P4: 97%), while the incidence of CAP decreased (P1: 2.10%, P2: 1.74%, P3: 1.13%, P4: 1.18%). IVI-guided PCI showed a significant association with a lower risk of the overall incidence of CAP (adjusted OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61-0.99; Conclusions: IVI-guided PCI may help prevent PCI-related CAP, especially in the setting of chronic total occlusion PCI and PCI for moderate or severe calcification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.