Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886176›Full record

ArticleBMJ oncology2024

Cancer incidence and competing mortality risk following 15 presenting symptoms in primary care: a population-based cohort study using electronic healthcare records.

Matthew E Barclay, Cristina Renzi, Hannah Harrison, Ana Torralbo, Becky White, Samantha Hiu Yan Ip, Juliet Usher-Smith, Jane Lange, Nora Pashayan, Spiros Denaxas and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matthew E BarclayDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-1922
Cristina RenziDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3845-9493
Hannah HarrisonDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8952-852X
Ana TorralboInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Becky WhiteDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.
Samantha Hiu Yan IpDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9162-6727
Juliet Usher-SmithDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-2531
Jane LangeCancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Nora PashayanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0843-2468
Spiros DenaxasInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9612-7791
Angela M WoodDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Antonis AntoniouDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Georgios LyratzopoulosDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2873-7421

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Assessment of age, sex and smoking-specific risk of cancer diagnosis and non-cancer mortality following primary care consultation for 15 new-onset symptoms. Methods and analysis: Data on patients aged 30-99 in 2007-2017 were extracted from a UK primary care database (CPRD Gold), comprising a randomly selected reference group and a symptomatic cohort of patients presenting with one of 15 new onset symptoms (abdominal pain, abdominal bloating, rectal bleed, change in bowel habit, dyspepsia, dysphagia, dyspnoea, haemoptysis, haematuria, fatigue, night sweats, weight loss, jaundice, breast lump and post-menopausal bleed).Time-to-event models were used to estimate outcome-specific hazards for site-specific cancer diagnosis and non-cancer mortality and to estimate cumulative incidence up to 12 months following index consultation. Results: Data included 1 622 419 patients, of whom 36 802 had a cancer diagnosis and 28 857 died without a cancer diagnosis within 12 months of the index.The risk of specific cancers exceeded the UK urgent referral risk threshold of 3% from a relatively young age for patients with red flag symptoms. For non-organ-specific symptoms, the risk of cancer at individual sites either did not reach the threshold at any age or reached it only in older patients. Conclusion: Patients with new-onset symptoms in primary care often have comparable risks of cancer diagnosis and non-cancer mortality. Non-organ-specific symptoms, in particular, are associated with elevated risk of cancer at multiple different sites. Management of symptomatic patients in primary care should be informed by the risk of different cancer types alongside mortality risk.

Indexed as

Epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID39886176
PMCPMC11660325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.