Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886169›Full record

ArticleBMJ oncology2024

Comparison of standard-dose and reduced-dose treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with enzalutamide, apalutamide or darolutamide: a rapid review.

Hannah Louise Bromley, Mohini Varughese, Duncan C Gilbert, Peter Hoskin, Ian F Tannock, Kimberley Reeves, Ananya Choudhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah Louise BromleyDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-1639
Mohini VarugheseRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Duncan C GilbertMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, UCL, London, UK.
Peter HoskinDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8323-9567
Ian F TannockPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2636-7041
Kimberley ReevesDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ananya ChoudhuryDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose enzalutamide, apalutamide or darolutamide treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. Methods and analysis: Keyword searches in MEDLINE and EMBASE up to 1 June 2023, with forward and backward citation searches of potentially relevant studies. Studies were included if primary outcome data were reported for patients with metastatic prostate cancer who had received reduced doses of enzalutamide, apalutamide or darolutamide. Searches were limited to original full-text and English-language studies. Key outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen response and treatment-related adverse events. The review was performed in accordance with Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group guidelines. Results: Ten studies were identified that met the eligibility criteria: five phase I studies, two post-hoc analyses of phase III trials and three retrospective analyses. No consistent association between OS, PFS and drug dose was identified. Fewer severe treatment-related adverse events were observed at lower drug doses. Conclusion: This review provides evidence that enzalutamide, apalutamide or darolutamide could be given at a lower than the standard recommended dose without loss of antitumour activity. A prospective near-equivalence randomised trial should be undertaken to compare registered and lower doses of these agents. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023440371.

Indexed as

Prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39886169
PMCPMC11235015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.