ArticleBMJ oncology2024
Under-representation of older Indian persons with cancer in clinical trials.
Article in BMJ oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geriatric oncology in LMICs: it is time to mature.BMJ oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Older patients with cancer have traditionally been under-represented in global clinical trials. There are no data from India regarding this issue. Methods and analysis: This was a retrospective analysis done at our institute on interventional studies conducted between 2003 and 2023 in adult patients with malignancies. We excluded studies done exclusively in the paediatric population and observational studies. Results: We included 21 894 patients enrolled in 150 interventional trials from the departments of surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, anaesthesia, and clinical pharmacology; 110 (73.3%) were investigator initiated. There were 38 trials (25.3%) in breast cancer (6141 patients, 28%), and 33 (22%) in head and neck cancer (6975 patients, 31.9%). Studies were predominantly phase III (97 trials (64.7%)). Multicentric studies comprised approximately one-third (48, 32%). The median age of enrolled patients was 51 years (IQR 43-59). There were 5132 (23.4%) participants aged ≥60 years, 2678 (12.2%) ≥65 years and 1045 (4.8%) ≥70 years. Data from the hospital registry revealed that 30% of adult registrations were ≥60 years. There was a significant increase in the proportion of older patients enrolled in clinical trials from 2003 (8%) to 2019 (22%) compared with their proportion in the hospital registry (stable at 28%-29%); p<0.001. Conclusion: There is a gap between the proportion of older Indian adults with cancer in the hospital registry and those enrolled in interventional clinical trials, however, this gap has shrunk over time. Various factors that limit the recruitment of this vulnerable cohort like age-specific eligibility criteria are immediately actionable to make clinical trials more inclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.