ArticleBMJ oncology2024
Exploring the value of routinely collected data on EQ-5D-5L and other electronic patient-reported outcome measures as prognostic factors in adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy.
Article in BMJ oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World First-Line Treatment Characteristics and Physician Drivers in Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and without Actionable Genomic Alterations.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- Real-world implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in routine oncology practice: a scoping review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Careful take-off by the EQ-5D-5L tool in lung cancer: fly little one, fly!BMJ oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Investigate whether routinely collected electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) add prognostic value to clinical and tumour characteristics for adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immunotherapy. Methods and analysis: We retrospectively analysed data from adults with advanced NSCLC commencing immunotherapy between April 2019 and June 2022. Prognostic factors were ePROMs on quality of life (EuroQoL five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L); EuroQoL Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) and symptoms (patient-reported version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0) completed at baseline and the first follow-up. We performed Cox proportional hazard regression for overall survival and time-to-progression as outcomes, and logistic regression for the onset of severe treatment toxicities (grade ≥3). Results: We included 379 patients; 161 (42.5%) completed ePROMs at baseline. Median overall survival and time-to-progression were 13.5 months (95% CI 11.3 to 16.7) and 10.5 months (95% CI 8.8 to 13.7), respectively. 36 (9.5%) experienced severe treatment toxicities during follow-up. Patients with lower EQ-5D-5L utility scores (HR per 0.1 unit increase 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95) and higher symptom burden (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.19) had poorer overall survival. This was also true for those with decreased EQ-VAS and increased symptom burden between baseline and the first follow-up. Lastly, only decreased EQ-5D-5L utility scores between baseline and the first follow-up were associated with shorter time-to-progression. Conclusion: ePROMs may add prognostic value to clinical and tumour characteristics for overall survival in adults with advanced NSCLC receiving immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.