ArticleBMJ oncology2024
Machine learning based on blood test biomarkers predicts fast progression in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy.
Article in BMJ oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CircRNA signature predicts immunotherapy response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Can blood-based markers predict RECIST progression in non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Machine learning predicted fast progression after initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.BMJ oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Fast progression (FP) represents a desperate situation for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We aimed to develop a predictive framework based on machine learning (ML) methods to identify FP in advanced NSCLC patients using blood test biomarkers. Methods and analysis: We extracted data of 1546 atezolizumab-treated patients from four multicentre clinical trials. In this study, patients from the OAK trial were taken for model training, whereas patients from the other trials were used for independent validations. The FP prediction model was developed using 21 pretreatment blood test variables in seven ML approaches. Prediction performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The prevalence of FP was 7.6% (118 of 1546) in all atezolizumab-treated patients. The most important variables for the prediction model were: C reactive protein, neutrophil count, lactate dehydrogenase and alanine transaminase. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm applied to these four blood test parameters demonstrated good performance: the area under the ROC curve obtained from the training cohort (OAK), validation cohort 1 (BIRCH) and cohort 2 (merged POPLAR and FIR) were 0.908, 0.666 and 0.776, respectively. In addition, the absolute difference in median survival between the SVM-predicted FP and non-FP groups was significant in both progression-free survival and overall survival (p<0.001). Conclusion: SVM trained using a 4-biomarker panel has good performance in predicting the occurrence of FP regardless of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, hence providing evidence for decision-making in single-agent atezolizumab immunotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.