ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2024
No biomedical engineering policy means no sustainability in health systems: perspective through a case of local biomedical training program in Tanzania.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the significance of strengthening the biomedical workforce in resource-limited settings has been widely acknowledged, there remains a paucity of information specific to the local context. In this regard, we underscore the importance of formulating a biomedical engineering policy based on empirical evidence. To provide such evidence, we conducted an analysis of the government-led biomedical training program in Tanzania, titled 'Capacity Enhancement of Medical Equipment Technical Services (CEOMETS)'. The program demonstrated statistically significant outcomes at the individual level, as evidenced by a T-test comparing pre- and post-self-assessments of self-efficacy indicators from 2018 to 2022 (n=121) (***p < 0.001). However, the program's impact was largely confined to individual-level capacity building, with limited effects at the systemic level. The findings also revealed substantial structural and institutional gaps, as well as a lack of engagement from global stakeholders and key actors in the field of biomedical engineering. From this perspective, therefore, we emphasize the necessity of two key preconditions. First, on a national level, there is an urgent need to develop strategic plans, guidelines, and workforce policies that formally integrate biomedical engineers into efforts to strengthen the health system in Tanzania. The other arm is a way to call for action to the global health players to engage more actively in supporting biomedical engineering development in such contexts. Ultimately, this perspective paper aims to set a milestone in establishing the policy-making process regarding biomedical engineering as a health policy issue in Tanzania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.