ArticleJournal of global infectious diseases
Epidemiology of Methicillin-resistant
Article in Journal of global infectious diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Neonatal Sepsis: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bloodstream infections with emphasis on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized and Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Molecular Epidemiology Clinical Manifestations, Decolonization Strategies, and Treatment Options of Methicillin-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Methods: We used a comprehensive search strategy across databases such as Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were independently reviewed and selected based on a variety of criteria, including the inclusion of neonates tested for MRSA colonization during NICU stay, and the reporting of community-acquired and hospital-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA) incidence levels. Exclusion criteria included studies outside NICUs, those focused on specific MRSA outbreaks or clinical infections, review studies, and those lacking abstracts or full texts. Five authors independently extracted data, which was summarized and checked for quality. Statistical analysis included a random-effects model to compute pooled proportions, stratification by geographical location, evaluation of heterogeneity, and examination of publication bias. Results: Our systematic review evaluated 62 studies out of an initial 536 records identified. The majority of the selected studies were conducted in high-income countries, primarily in the United States. From these studies, we estimated a cumulative incidence rate of 7.2% for MRSA colonization in NICUs. When the source of MRSA was considered, CA-MRSA incidence was 2.7%, while HA-MRSA incidence was notably higher at 11%. A subgroup analysis showed geographical differences in the cumulative incidence of MRSA colonization in NICUs, with Brazil having the lowest incidence and Taiwan the highest. The proportion of HA-MRSA colonization also varied significantly by country, with South Korea reporting higher incidence rates than the United States. However, the differences in CA-MRSA colonization rates between countries and WHO regions were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our systematic review found a cumulative incidence of 7.2% for MRSA colonization in NICUs, with HA-MRSA (11%) being more prevalent than CA-MRSA (2.7%). Regional variations were detected, with Taiwan exhibiting the highest cumulative incidence and South Korea having both the highest CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA. These findings underline the substantial public health impact of MRSA, especially in NICUs, necessitating context-specific prevention and control strategies. Future research should strive to address these regional disparities and aspire to attain a more globally representative understanding of MRSA colonization rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.