Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886067›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Evaluating conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease with structural MRI: a machine learning study.

Daniela Vecchio, Federica Piras, Federica Natalizi, Nerisa Banaj, Clelia Pellicano, Fabrizio Piras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela VecchioNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome 00179, Italy.
Federica PirasNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome 00179, Italy.
Federica NataliziNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome 00179, Italy.
Nerisa BanajNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome 00179, Italy.
Clelia PellicanoNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome 00179, Italy.
Fabrizio PirasNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome 00179, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is a disabling neurodegenerative disorder for which no effective treatment currently exists. To predict the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease could be crucial for patients' outcome, but current Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are invasive, time consuming or expensive. Thus, developing MRI-based computational methods for Alzheimer's disease early diagnosis would be essential to narrow down the phenotypic measures predictive of cognitive decline. Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is associated with higher risk for Alzheimer's disease, and here, we aimed to identify MRI-based quantitative rules to predict aMCI to possible Alzheimer's disease conversion, applying different machine learning algorithms sequentially. At baseline, T1-weighted brain images were collected for 104 aMCI patients and processed to obtain 146 volumetric measures of cerebral grey matter regions [regions of interest (ROIs)]. One year later, patients were classified as converters (aMCI-c = 32) or non-converters, i.e. clinically and neuropsychologically stable (aMCI-s = 72) based on cognitive performance. Feature selection was performed by random forest (RF), and the identified seven ROIs volumetric data were used to implement support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree (DT) classification algorithms. Both SVM and DT reached an average accuracy of 86% in identifying aMCI-c and aMCI-s. DT found a critical threshold volume of the right entorhinal cortex (EC-r) as the first feature for differentiating aMCI-c/aMCI-s. Almost all aMCI-c had an EC-r volume <1286 mm

Indexed as

Alzheimer predictionmachine learningMRI

Identifiers

PMID39886067
PMCPMC11780885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.