Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886063›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2024

Monitoring neoadjuvant treatment-induced surgical benefit in GIST patients using CT-based radiological criteria.

Ylva A Weeda, Gijsbert M Kalisvaart, Henk H Hartgrink, Aart J van der Molen, Hans Gelderblom, Judith V M G Bovée, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei, Willem Grootjans, Jos A van der Hage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ylva A WeedaDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Gijsbert M KalisvaartDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Henk H HartgrinkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Aart J van der MolenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hans GelderblomDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Judith V M G BovéeDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Lioe-Fee de Geus-OeiDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Willem GrootjansDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jos A van der HageDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This single-centre retrospective study aims to determine the incidence of therapy-induced surgical benefit in patients with non-metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) treated with neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and evaluate whether this can be predicted by radiological response criteria. Methods: Thirty-nine non-metastatic GIST patients were treated with neoadjuvant TKI treatment, followed by curative-intended surgery, and monitored using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). Surgical benefit was independently assessed by two surgical oncologists and was defined by de-escalation of surgical strategy or reduced surgical complexity. Radiological response between baseline and the last preoperative scan was determined through RECIST 1.1, Choi and volumetric criteria. Results: In this patient cohort, median neoadjuvant treatment interval was 8.3 (IQR, 3.9-10.6) months. Surgical benefit was gained in 22/39 patients. When comparing radiological criteria to findings on surgical benefit, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for RECIST 1.1 (90 %, 100.0 % and 82 %), Choi (64 %, 24 %, and 96 %) and volumetry (95 %, 100.0 %, and 91 %) were calculated. In 30/39 patients, temporal changes in tumour size over the course of treatment was assessed. Tumour volume reduced significantly in the surgical-benefit group compared to the non-benefit group (72 % vs. 25 %, Conclusion: Surgical benefit after neoadjuvant treatment was achieved in 56 % of patients and was most accurately reflected by size-based response criteria. In patients with therapy-induced surgical benefit, nearly all treatment-induced volume reductions were achieved within three months.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyGastrointestinal stromal tumourResponse monitoringSurgeryTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39886063
PMCPMC11780385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.