ArticlePeerJ2025
Surgical outcomes in patients with Achilles tendon rupture-a retrospective study.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic flexor hallucis longus transfer in the patients with chronic achilles rupture.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- CBD-conjugated BMP-inhibiting exosomes on collagen scaffold dual-target Achilles tendon repair: Synergistic regeneration and heterotopic ossification prevention.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are two main methods used to treat Achilles tendon rupture (ATR): conservative treatment and surgical intervention. Surgical techniques are divided into three main categories: open surgical repair, mini-open surgical repair, and percutaneous repair (PR). We aimed to compare clinical outcomes in individuals with ATR who were treated with PR, primary repair, and flexor hallucis longus augmentation (FHL-A) with those treated with V-Y plasty and FHL-A. Methods: The study involved 54 patients who underwent ATR surgical intervention retrospectively. Thirty-two of these were identified as acute and 22 were chronic rupture patients. PR was performed in 32 patients, primary repair and FHL-A in 14 patients, and V-Y plasty and FHL-A in eight patients. Results: The mean forward jump was 142.69 ± 7.14 cm in individuals who received PR, 137.71 ± 4.51 cm in those who received primary repair + FHL-A, and 123.88 ± 3.09 cm in those who received V-Y plasty + FHL-A ( Conclusion: Although no surgical technique is completely superior to another, better performance tests were observed after PR repair compared to open surgery in individuals involved in sports, but rerupture, dorsiflexion restriction, and painful ankle were disadvantages. FHL-A, which has gained popularity in recent years, showed better performance in tests by contributing to more stable and stronger ankles in sporting individuals with chronic ruptures who had undergone open surgery. FHL-A can be utilized in addition to primary surgical intervention in individuals with high performance expectations before and after injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.