ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Unravelling the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on hemostatic and complement systems: a systems immunology perspective.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative transcriptomic and systems biology analysis of public SLE datasets identifies immune regulatory pathways.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- COVID-19: a vascular nightmare unfolding.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Systems immunology: When systems biology meets immunology.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hemostatic system prevents and stops bleeding, maintaining circulatory integrity after injury. It directly interacts with the complement system, which is key to innate immunity. In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), dysregulation of the hemostatic and complement systems has been associated with several complications. To understand the essential balance between activation and regulation of these systems, a quantitative systems immunology model can be established. The dynamics of the components are examined under three distinct conditions: the disease state representing symptomatic COVID-19 state, an intervened disease state marked by reduced levels of regulators, and drug interventions including heparin, tranexamic acid, avdoralimab, garadacimab, and tocilizumab. Simulation results highlight key components affected, including thrombin, tissue plasminogen activator, plasmin, fibrin degradation products, interleukin 6 (IL-6), the IL-6 and IL-6R complex, and the terminal complement complex (C5b-9). We explored that the decreased levels of complement factor H and C1-inhibitor significantly elevate these components, whereas tissue factor pathway inhibitor and alpha-2-macroglobulin have more modest effects. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that drug interventions have a restorative impact on these factors. Notably, targeting thrombin and plasmin in the early stages of thrombosis and fibrinolysis can improve the overall system. Additionally, the regulation of C5b-9 could aid in lysing the virus and/or infected cells. In conclusion, this study explains the regulatory mechanisms of the hemostatic and complement systems and illustrates how the biopathway machinery sustains the balance between activation and inhibition. The knowledge that we have acquired could contribute to designing therapies that target the hemostatic and complement systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.