ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Incidence of cardiac arrest following implementation of a predictive analytics display in a pediatric intensive care unit.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive analytics characterize cardiovascular function and outcomes following cardiac surgery.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Clinical Applications of Data Science and Machine Learning in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: More than 90% of in-hospital cardiac arrests involving children occur in an intensive care unit (ICU) with less than half surviving to discharge. We sought to assess the association of the display of risk scores of cardiovascular and respiratory instability with the incidence of cardiac arrest in a pediatric ICU. Methods: Employing supervised machine learning, we previously developed predictive models of cardiovascular and respiratory instability, incorporating real-time physiologic and laboratory data, to display risk scores for potentially catastrophic clinical events in the subsequent 12 h. Clinical implementation with risk scores displayed on large screen monitors in multiple areas throughout the ICU was finalized in July 2022. We compared the incidence of cardiac arrest events in the 18-months pre- and post-implementation. Results: The cardiac arrest incidence rate dropped from 3.0 events (95% CI 2.0-4.4) to 2.4 events (95% CI 1.6-3.5) per 1000 patient days following implementation. We observed a 50% increase in the rate of cardiac arrest events where return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved ( Conclusions: We observed a non-significant decrease in the rates of cardiac arrest events and an increase in the rate of cardiac arrests events where ROSC was achieved following the implementation of a predictive analytics display of risk scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.