Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885975›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2025

The association between the type of bystander and survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A French nationwide study.

Hizia Benkerrou, Marguerite Lockhart, Matthieu Heidet, Ramy Azzouz, Christian Vilhelm, Hervé Hubert, Morgan Recher, Valentine Baert, GR-RéACb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hizia BenkerrouUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques Médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Marguerite LockhartUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques Médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Matthieu HeidetAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), SAMU 94 et Urgences, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, F-94000 Créteil, France.
Ramy AzzouzUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques Médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Christian VilhelmUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques Médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Hervé HubertUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques Médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Morgan RecherUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques Médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Valentine BaertUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques Médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
GR-RéACb

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early bystander interventions are associated with more favorable outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The objective of the present study was to determine whether the type of bystander-patient relationship was associated with survival and neurological outcomes after OHCA in France. Methods: We analyzed data registered in the French National Cardiac Arrest Registry (RéAC) between July 1st, 2011, and April 30th, 2023. The study population comprised bystander-attended cases of OHCA managed by the emergency medical services. Bystanders were categorized as family members, other laypersons, off-duty professional first responders, or off-duty healthcare professionals. The primary outcome was 30-day survival with a favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2). The secondary outcomes included the bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation rate, return of spontaneous circulation, and survival upon admission to the hospital. Our statistical analyses were based on bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions analyses. Results: Among the 89,861 OHCA cases analyzed, family members constituted the largest group of bystanders (69.2%). Compared with non-family-member bystanders, family bystander status was associated with a lower CPR initiation rate, a longer no-flow time, and lower 30-day survival rates. Specifically, cases of OHCA with non-family-member bystanders were 32% more likely to survive with a CPC of 1-2 at day 30 than cases with family member bystanders. Medically trained bystander status (off-duty professional first responders and healthcare professionals) was associated with higher CPR initiation and 30-day survival rates, relative to nontrained laypersons. Conclusions: Survival after an OHCA appears to be associated with the type of bystander. Although family members were the most common bystanders, they were less likely to initiate CPR and less likely to see the OHCA patient survive. Efforts to increase the post-OHCA survival rate should include targeted interventions (such as public education and training programs) that emphasize the importance of early CPR and automated external defibrillator use by family members.

Indexed as

Basic life supportBystander interventionsCardiopulmonary resuscitationOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID39885975
PMCPMC11780125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.