Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885953›Full record

ArticleAccess microbiology2025

Interaction with refuse piles is associated with co-occurrence of core gut microbiota in workers of the ant Aphaenogaster picea.

Alison Pagalilauan, Christina Pavloudi, Santiago Meneses Ospina, Adam Smith, Jimmy H Saw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Access microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Host and Microbe Scale Processes Shape Spatial Variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison PagalilauanDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA.
Christina PavloudiDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5106-6067
Santiago Meneses OspinaDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA.
Adam SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA.
Jimmy H SawDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8353-3854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparing the diversity of gut microbiota between and within social insect colonies can illustrate interactions between bacterial community composition and host behaviour. In many eusocial insect species, different workers exhibit different task behaviours. Evidence of compositional differences between core microbiota in different worker types could suggest a microbial association with the division of labour among workers. Here, we present the core microbiota of

Indexed as

16S rRNAAphaenogasterbacterial communitycolony phenotypedivision of labourmicrobiomesocial insectstask specialization

Identifiers

PMID39885953
PMCPMC11781628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.