Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885941›Full record

ReviewBMJ oncology2025

Thirty years from FDA approval of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx): an updated analysis and future perspective.

Alberto A Gabizon, Shira Gabizon-Peretz, Shadan Modaresahmadi, Ninh M La-Beck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Analyzing Molecular Determinants of Nanodrugs' Cytotoxic Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CaMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alberto A GabizonThe Leah and Jakub Susskind Nano-Oncology Research Laboratory, Helmsley Cancer Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1332-1164
Shira Gabizon-PeretzDavidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Central, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1494-6510
Shadan ModaresahmadiDepartment of Immunotherapeutics and Biotechnology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Jerry H Hodge School of Pharmacy, Abilene, Texas, USA.
Ninh M La-BeckDepartment of Immunotherapeutics and Biotechnology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Jerry H Hodge School of Pharmacy, Abilene, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-3263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2025, it will be 30 years since the initial clinical approval of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) by the Food and Drug Administration. PLD predated the field of nanomedicine and became a model nanomedicine setting key pharmacological principles (prolonged circulation, slow drug release and the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect) for clinical application of other nano-drugs in cancer therapy. The impressive reduction of cardiotoxicity conferred by PLD is the most valuable clinical asset. While PLD has gained a strong foothold in relapsed ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer, it has not been extensively tested in primary (neoadjuvant) and adjuvant therapy and has not fulfilled the expectations from the results in animal models efficacy-wise. This discrepancy may be due to the large dose gap between mice and humans and the apparent variability of the EPR effect in human cancer. PLD is a complex product and we are still in a learning curve regarding a number of factors such as its interaction with the complement system and its immune modulatory properties, as well as its integration in multimodality therapy that may potentiate its value and role in cancer therapy.

Indexed as

breast cancer (female)chemotherapydrug deliveryimmunotherapyovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID39885941
PMCPMC11751825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.