ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Development of a portable testing chamber to assess imaging performance of laparoscopes in low- and middle-income countries.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Laparoscopic surgery is generally unavailable in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to the high cost of installation and lack of qualified personnel to maintain and repair equipment. We developed a low-cost, durable, reusable laparoscopic system, called the KeyScope laparoscope, for use in LMICs. To reliably build and service the KeyScope in LMICs, a portable testing chamber (PTC) is needed to assess image performance. Aim: A PTC was developed to characterize KeyScope laparoscope performance in LMICs. Approach: Images of standard resolution, color accuracy, distortion, and depth of field (DOF) targets were captured in both a standard optical bench setup (OBS) and the PTC. Measurements from the OBS and PTC were quantified and compared using standard software (ImageJ and Imatest). To further reduce cost, alternative paper imaging targets were identified and compared with standard glass targets. To improve usability, MATLAB applications (apps) were developed to automate image analysis and reduce cost. Results: The PTC achieved similar results compared to the OBS for the image quality metrics, distortion and DOF. Further, the PTC presented similar results to the OBS for resolution at 4 to 7 cm working distances and improved resolution at periphery working distances of 3 and 10 cm. Color accuracy values were also improved in the PTC compared with those measured in the OBS. The low-cost resolution, color accuracy, and distortion targets resulted in similar image quality results to the standard image quality target. MATLAB apps produced similar results to Imatest and ImageJ software and decreased the time to complete image quality test analysis. Conclusion: The low-cost portable design of the PTC will facilitate the translation of the KeyScope by enabling accurate and fast characterization of laparoscopic imaging performance in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.