ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
ORUS: Ultrasonic Ostemodeling for Body Contouring.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An attractive waist-hip ratio leads to a favorable aesthetic appearance in women and can be achieved through the Methods: The ORUS technique was performed on 120 patients between 18 and 50 years of age. Patients were grouped according to the surgical procedure performed: ORUS (11 patients), ORUS + liposuction (n = 87), and ORUS + abdominoplasty (n = 22). Demographic and clinical preoperative and postoperative data were recorded in all patients included. Measurements of waist-hip index and body mass index were done in centimeters, and at 90 days, a computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction was indicated. Results: The surgery time depended on the procedure and varied from 30 minutes in the ORUS procedure to 180 minutes when it was combined with an abdominoplasty. A waist reduction was achieved with median preoperative measurements ranging from 89.0-110.0 to 65.0-69.0 cm depending on the procedure. The size of the incision did not exceed 1.2 cm, and only 2 patients had symptomatic atelectasis. The median total Body-QoL score ranged between 97 and 99 points from a maximum of 100 points. Conclusions: The proposed ORUS technique achieved a waist and waist-hip index reduction with minor complications, a minimum scar, and a high satisfaction level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.