ArticleHuman genomics2025
Genetic diversity of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in cohorts of patients affected with SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain (IGH) genomic region is responsible for the production of circulating antibodies and warrants careful investigation for its association with COVID-19 characteristics. Multiple allelic variants within and across different IGH gene segments form a limited set of haplotypes. Previous studies have shown associations between some of these haplotypes and clinical outcomes of COVID-19. We typed 445 individuals of European ancestry, stratified for gender, age, and clinical status for 4 SNPs, two of which result in amino acid substitutions in IGHA2 and IGHG4, respectively. We analyzed associations at the single-locus level and for 4-loci haplotypes, inferred by phasing, after stratifying the overall cohort by gender, age, and disease severity.
resultsOnly weak evidence of significant differences between subgroups was obtained at the level of a single SNP. However, when the haplotypic data were analyzed for the young and old subgroups separately, uneven partitioning was observed regarding the occurrence of severe cases and Resistors. We then examined the cross-tabulation of disease severity in males and females, based on the presence of each haplotype in the genotype. Two haplotypes were underrepresented in young severe cases compared to old severe ones. The same two haplotypes were overrepresented among young Resistors. These findings provide stronger support for, the weak associations observed at the single locus level.
conclusionsTwo haplotypes seem to act as protective factors specifically in young individuals, counteracting the general increase in vulnerability with age. This observation aligns with stronger genetic effects seen in young patients for other susceptibility genes. Our findings complement previous research identifying specific genetic variants that influence COVID-19 susceptibility and severity, emphasizing the complex interplay between host genetics and viral infection outcomes. Our results are consistent with a potential causative role of IGH regulatory regions (e.g. HS1.2), which are flanked by the SNP set here analyzed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.