Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Robot-assisted Therapy in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) During Assisted Cycling Training for Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: a Randomized, Double-blind Study.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The evidence landscape, clinical role, and mechanisms of action of robot-assisted injury treatment: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for motor function and functional independence in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for lower limb rehabilitation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Statistical quality in RCTs of technology-based rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: A CHAMP-Based Meta-Research Study.Spinal cord · 2026Review
- A biodegradable piezoelectric vertebral implant for programmable electro-neuromodulation in spinal cord injury.Science advances · 2026Article
- Overcoming Barriers to Axonal Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Frontiers.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Feasibility and Safety of Combined Robot-Assisted Gait Training and Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Pediatric Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Study design considerations in clinical trials testing transcutaneous stimulation for spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2026Review
- Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation plus locomotor training versus sham-stimulation plus locomotor training in chronic spinal cord injury (eWALK): a multicentre, triple-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- The Interplay Between Neuromodulation and Stem Cell Therapy for Sensory-Motor Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: A Perspective View.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Efficacy of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with overground robotic-assisted gait training in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Lower limb rehabilitation in chronic incomplete SCI: a randomized controlled trial protocol comparing combined TMS-tSCS neuromodulation vs. tSCS alone.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Electrical and optogenetic spinal cord stimulation for movement recovery after spinal cord injury.Current opinion in neurology · 2025Review
- Multimodal Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Lesion: Comparative Outcomes of Vojta Therapy and Lokomat Training.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Limb Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Reliability and validity of a video-based markerless motion capture system in young healthy subjects.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Exploring the feasibility of combining transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation and overground robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.
objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.
methodsA randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up.
resultsAlthough no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up.
conclusionsThe outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.