Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885542›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Natalia Comino-Suárez, Juan C Moreno, Álvaro Megía-García, Antonio J Del-Ama, Diego Serrano-Muñoz, Juan Avendaño-Coy, Ángel Gil-Agudo, Mónica Alcobendas-Maestro, Esther López-López, Julio Gómez-Soriano

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05210166 nacompletednot on this map

Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Robot-assisted Therapy in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled27ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsActive tSCS and Lokomat, Sham tSCS and Lokomat
NCT07445685 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) During Assisted Cycling Training for Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: a Randomized, Double-blind Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundació Sant Joan de DéuRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsIncomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)ArmsTranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation on the dorsal region between T11 and T12, Sham transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on the dorsal region between T11 and T12
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natalia Comino-SuárezToledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
Juan C MorenoBioRobotics Group, Center for Automation and Robotics, CSIC-UPM, Spanish National Research Council, Ctra. Campo Real Km 0,2., 28500, Arganda del Rey, Madrid, Spain. jc.moreno@csic.es.
Álvaro Megía-GarcíaToledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
Antonio J Del-AmaBioengineering Systems and Technologies Research Group, School of Science and Technology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
Diego Serrano-MuñozToledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
Juan Avendaño-CoyToledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
Ángel Gil-AgudoUnit of Neurorehabilitation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM), Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC, Toledo, Spain.
Mónica Alcobendas-MaestroDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Hospital for Paraplegics, Toledo, Spain.
Esther López-LópezDepartment of Physical Therapy, National Hospital for Paraplegics, Toledo, Spain.
Julio Gómez-SorianoToledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.

objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.

methodsA randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. All subjects conducted a standard Lokomat walking training program of 40 sessions (5 familiarization sessions, followed by 20 sessions combined with active or sham tSCS, and finally the last 15 sessions with standard Lokomat). Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were also assessed for lower limb muscles. Assessments were performed before and after tSCS intervention and after 3-weeks follow-up.

resultsAlthough no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p = 0.033), 10MWT (37.5 s; p = 0.030), TUG (47.7 s; p = 0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p = 0.023) at the 1-month follow-up compared to baseline. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk 10 m at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p = 0.029). Finally, a significant difference (p = 0.049) was observed in the comparison of the effects in the amplitude of the rectus femoris MEPs of tSCS group (- 0.97 mV) and the sham group (- 3.39 mV) at follow-up.

conclusionsThe outcomes of this study suggest that the combination of standard Lokomat training with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after 1 month of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05210166).

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyGait Disorders, NeurologicRoboticsSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultBody WeightDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthRecovery of FunctionGait rehabilitationLokomatMotor functionRobotic-assisted gait trainingSpinal cord injuryTranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39885542
PMCPMC11780808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.