Observational studyBMC medical education2025
Perceived impact of physiotherapy-related debates on the social platform "X" on physiotherapists' professional development and knowledge acquisition: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use Patterns and Challenges of the Social Media Platform X Among Physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Saudi Arabia, the social media platform "X" (formerly known as "Twitter") is widely utilized by healthcare professionals. This study aimed to assess the perceived impact of physiotherapy-related debates on X on the professional development and knowledge acquisition of physiotherapists.
methodsA cross-sectional, online survey-based study was conducted among licensed physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia. The study followed established international reporting guidelines, including the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys, and Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys.
resultsA total of 188 physiotherapists participated, with the majority (n = 143;76.1%) actively using X. Many participants indicated positive impacts on their perspectives or approaches to physiotherapy, enhancement of their critical thinking skills, and acquisition of new knowledge or insights (n = 73; 51.0% agreed, n = 26; 18.2% strongly agreed). Furthermore, participants reported gaining knowledge of research findings (n = 45; 31.5% agreed, n = 44; 30.8% strongly agreed) and new treatment techniques (n = 48; 33.6% agreed, n = 42; 29.4% strongly agreed). Additionally, 30.1% (n = 43) agreed and 6.3% (n = 9) strongly agreed that these debates influenced their professional development, whereas 46.2% (n = 66) remained neutral.
conclusionsPhysiotherapy-related debates on the social media platform X positively impacted physiotherapists' perspectives by enhancing critical thinking and knowledge acquisition. Such online debates may serve as valuable tools for professional development in physiotherapy practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.