ArticleBMC oral health2025
The antibiofilm effect and mechanism of silver nanowire-modified glass ionomer cement against multi-species oral biofilm.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Green-synthesized nanoparticles for glass ionomer cement reinforcement: a systematic review of their antimicrobial, mechanical, and physicochemical properties.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Bletilla striata polysaccharide modified glass ionomer cement: enhanced mechanical and biological properties.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental glass ionomer cement modified by the incorporation of nanoselenuim: antibacterial activity, cytocompatibility and compressive strength.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Impact of Environmental and Material Factors on Fluoride Release from Metal-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Fluoride Release from Pediatric Dental Restorative Materials: A Laboratory Investigation.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Naringin as a non-antibiotic agent for multi-species oral biofilm control:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the antibiofilm effect and mechanism of the silver nanowire (AgNW)-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) against multi-species oral biofilm, and to examine the mechanical and biochemical properties of this novel GIC material.
methodsConventional GIC was incorporated with different concentrations of AgNW and silver nanoparticles (AgNP). Multi-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus fermentum, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus were cultured for 72 h on GIC specimens. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was adopted to examine the accumulation of biofilm on GIC surfaces. A live/dead assay was performed to assess the viability of bacteria. Extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) were labelled with Alexa Fluor 647-labelled dextran conjugate and then observed by a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). The D/L-Lactic Acid Assay Kit was used to evaluate the lactic acid production of the multi-species biofilms. Compressive strength, surface roughness, hardness, and wettability were measured by a universal testing machine, an atomic force microscope (AFM), a Vickers microhardness tester, and a contact angle meter, respectively. Colour stability and fluoride release of GIC specimens were assessed by VITA Easyshade® V and ion chromatography. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) was used to study cytotoxicity.
resultsSEM images showed that fewer biofilms were accumulated on the AgNW-GIC surfaces. The live/dead assay showed that the ratio of live bacteria was significantly lower in AgNW-GIC groups than in conventional GIC (5.8% vs. 100%, p < 0.0001). The EPS production was significantly less in AgNW-GIC groups compared to conventional GIC (p < 0.0001). There is no difference between groups regarding lactic acid production and fluoride release. The mechanical strength including compressive strength, surface roughness, hardness, and wettability were comparable between groups. The colour change between AgNW-GIC and conventional GIC was much milder than that between AgNP-GIC and conventional GIC. The results of cytotoxicity showed no significant differences in cell viability between groups.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that AgNW-GIC had an excellent antibiofilm effect against multi-species oral biofilm, comparable mechanical and biochemical properties, and did not significantly affect the colour stability of GIC. The antibiofilm mechanism of AgNW-GIC may be related to inhibiting the viability and EPS production of bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.