SynthesisBMC women's health2025
Home and outpatient electrostimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Home and outpatient electrostimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUrinary incontinence (UI) is defined as any involuntary loss of urine and can be associated with urgency and/or physical exertion. Electrical stimulation (ES) has recently been identified as a proven therapeutic alternative for UI, with few side effects and low cost. This systematic review, registered on the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (RD42024528812), investigated whether home-based ES would be as viable as outpatient ES in the treatment of women with UI.
methodsStudy selection was conducted by two independent researchers across the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PEDro (search conducted on February 25, 2024). We also searched the reference lists of eligible articles. There were no restrictions on date and language. The RoB2 and GRADE tools were used to assess methodological quality and evidence recommendation.
results723 articles were found, and four trials were eligible. Very low-quality evidence indicated statistically significant differences in cure rates or improvement of urinary symptoms in women treated with both outpatient and home-based ES. Low-quality evidence recommends home-based ES in maintaining improvement of urinary symptoms, and moderate-quality evidence indicates no severity of symptoms in the home-based group.
conclusionHome-based ES is shown to be as effective as outpatient ES in the treatment of UI in women. However, data analysis revealed low-quality evidence regarding the cure or improvement of the women's conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.