ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Development and application of reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR technology for sensitive detection of BVDV-1 and BTV in bovine semen.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of an RT-Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Detection of Peste des Petits Ruminants.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Bluetongue virus in Middle Eastern ruminants: vector evidence, surveillance gaps, and research priorities.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBovine viral diarrhoea virus genotype 1 (BVDV-1) and bluetongue virus (BTV) are potent viral pathogens that may be transmitted through semen, resulting in the spread of diseases via artificial insemination. Thus, establishing an early detection method for BVDV-1 and BTV infection is important for the trading of semen. In this study, we developed two RT‒ddPCR methods to detect BVDV-1 and BTV, and each method was evaluated for repeatability, limit of detection and specificity. The sensitivity of these methods was compared with that of RT‒qPCR (WOAH) by analysing clinical samples.
resultsThe RT‒ddPCR results revealed that both methods exhibited good repeatability at low concentrations, with detection limits of 1.05 copies/µL and 0.662 copies/µL per reaction for BVDV-1 and BTV, respectively; additionally, both methods exhibited high specificity and did not exhibit cross-reaction with other important semen-transmitted pathogens. Eighty bovine semen samples and twenty mixed semen samples were tested. The results revealed that the positivity rates of BVDV-1 and BTV RT‒ddPCR (25% and 23%, respectively) were greater than those of RT‒qPCR (19% and 18%, respectively).
conclusionsRT‒ddPCR was highly sensitive for detecting low concentrations of BVDV-1 and BTV in clinical samples and could be a good supplement for qPCR testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.