Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885442›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Risk factors and machine learning prediction models for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Yingchun Ren, Xiaoying Shan, Gengchao Ding, Ling Ai, Weiying Zhu, Ying Ding, Fuzhou Yu, Yun Chen, Beijiao Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yingchun RenCollege of Data Science, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China.
Xiaoying ShanCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China.
Gengchao DingCollege of Data Science, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China.
Ling AiJiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China. ygrhfly2024@163.com.
Weiying ZhuJiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China. jdfly2024@163.com.
Ying DingJiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China.
Fuzhou YuJiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China.
Yun ChenJiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China.
Beijiao WuJiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a liver disorder that occurs in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and is associated with a significant risk of fetal complications, including premature birth and fetal death. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of ICP is predominantly based on the presence of pruritus in pregnant women and elevated serum total bile acid. However, this approach may result in missed or delayed diagnoses. Therefore, it is essential to explore the risk factors associated with ICP and to accurately identify affected individuals to enable timely prophylactic interventions. The existing literature exhibits a paucity of studies employing artificial intelligence to predict ICP. Therefore, developing machine learning-based diagnostic and severity classification models for ICP holds significant importance.

methodsThis study included ICP patients and some healthy pregnant women from Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital in China between July 2020 and October 2023. We collected clinical data during their pregnancies and selected the top 11 critical risk factors through univariable and lasso regression analysis. The dataset was randomly divided into training and testing cohorts. Thirteen machine learning techniques, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Network, were employed. Based on their various classification performances on the training set, the top five models were selected for internal validation.

resultsThe dataset included 798 participants (300 normal, 312 mild, and 186 severe cases). Through univariable and lasso regression analysis, total bile acid, gamma-glutamyl transferase, multiple pregnancy, lymphocyte percentage, hematocrit, neutrophil percentage, prothrombin time, Aspartate aminotransferase, red blood cell count, lymphocyte count and platelet count were identified as risk factors of ICP. The AUCs of the selected top five models ranged from 0.9509 to 0.9614. The CatBoost model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.9614 (95% confidence interval, 0.9377-0.9813), an accuracy of 0.9085, a precision of 0.8930, a recall of 0.9059, and a F1-score of 0.8981.

conclusionsWe identified risk factors for ICP and developed machine learning models based on these factors. These models demonstrated good performance and can be used to help predict whether pregnant women have ICP and the degree of ICP (mild or severe).

Indexed as

Cholestasis, IntrahepaticMachine LearningPregnancy ComplicationsAdultCase-Control StudiesChinaFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPregnancyRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancyMachine learningPrediction modelRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39885442
PMCPMC11780866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.