Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885431›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

The Danish Drowning Cohort: Utstein-style data from fatal and non-fatal drowning incidents in Denmark.

Niklas Breindahl, Kasper Bitzer, Oliver B Sørensen, Alexander Wildenschild, Signe A Wolthers, Tim Lindskou, Jacob Steinmetz, Stig N F Blomberg, Helle C Christensen, Danish Drowning Validation Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Niklas BreindahlPrehospital Center Region Zealand, Ringstedgade 61, 14th Floor, Naestved, 4700, Denmark. nbrei@regsj.dk.
Kasper BitzerPrehospital Center Region Zealand, Ringstedgade 61, 14th Floor, Naestved, 4700, Denmark.
Oliver B SørensenThe Prehospital Research Unit, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Alexander WildenschildPrehospital Center Region Zealand, Ringstedgade 61, 14th Floor, Naestved, 4700, Denmark.
Signe A WolthersPrehospital Center Region Zealand, Ringstedgade 61, 14th Floor, Naestved, 4700, Denmark.
Tim LindskouCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.
Jacob SteinmetzDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig N F BlombergPrehospital Center Region Zealand, Ringstedgade 61, 14th Floor, Naestved, 4700, Denmark.
Helle C ChristensenPrehospital Center Region Zealand, Ringstedgade 61, 14th Floor, Naestved, 4700, Denmark.
Danish Drowning Validation Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective interventions to reduce drowning incidents require accurate and reliable data for scientific analysis. However, the lack of high-quality evidence and the variability in drowning terminology, definitions, and outcomes present significant challenges in assessing studies to inform drowning guidelines. Many drowning reports use inappropriate classifications for drowning incidents, which significantly contributes to the underreporting of drowning. In particular, non-fatal drowning incidents are underreported because many countries do not routinely collect this data. THE DANISH DROWNING COHORT: The Danish Drowning Cohort was established in 2016 to facilitate research to improve preventative, rescue, and treatment interventions to reduce the incidence, mortality, and morbidity of drowning. The Danish Drowning Cohort contains nationwide data on all fatal and non-fatal drowning incidents treated by the Danish Emergency Medical Services. Data are extracted from the Danish prehospital electronic medical record using a text-search algorithm (Danish Drowning Formula) and a manual validation process. The WHO definition of drowning, supported by the clarification statement for non-fatal drowning, is used as the case definition to identify drowning. All drowning patients are included, including unwitnessed incidents, non-conveyed patients, patients declared dead prehospital, or patients with obvious clinical signs of irreversible death. This method allows syndromic surveillance and monitors a nationwide cohort of fatal and non-fatal drowning incidents in near-real time to inform future prevention strategies. The Danish Drowning Cohort complies with the Utstein style for drowning reporting guidelines. The 30-day mortality is obtained through the Civil Personal Register to differentiate between fatal and non-fatal drowning incidents. In addition to prehospital data, new data linkages with other Danish registries via the patient's civil registration number will enable the examination of various additional factors associated with drowning risk.

conclusionThe Danish Drowning Cohort contains nationwide prehospital data on all fatal and non-fatal drowning incidents treated by the Danish Emergency Medical Service. It is a basis for all research on drowning in Denmark and may improve preventative, rescue, and treatment interventions to reduce the incidence, mortality, and morbidity of drowning.

Indexed as

DrowningEmergency Medical ServicesAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMiddle AgedDanish drowning formulaDatabaseDrowningElectronic medical recordsEmergency medical servicesRegisterSyndromic surveillance

Identifiers

PMID39885431
PMCPMC11783961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.