ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Biomedical named entity recognition using improved green anaconda-assisted Bi-GRU-based hierarchical ResNet model.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiomedical text mining is a technique that extracts essential information from scientific articles using named entity recognition (NER). Traditional NER methods rely on dictionaries, rules, or curated corpora, which may not always be accessible. To overcome these challenges, deep learning (DL) methods have emerged. However, DL-based NER methods may need help identifying long-distance relationships within text and require significant annotated datasets.
resultsThis research has proposed a novel model to address the challenges in natural language processing. The Improved Green anaconda-assisted Bi-GRU based Hierarchical ResNet BNER model (IGa-BiHR BNERM) is the model. IGa-BiHR BNERM model has shown promising results in accurately identifying named entities. The MACCROBAT dataset was obtained from Kaggle and underwent several pre-processing steps such as Stop Word Filtering, WordNet processing, Removal of non-alphanumeric characters, stemming Segmentation, and Tokenization, which is standardized and improves its quality. The pre-processed text was fed into a feature extraction model like the Robustly Optimized BERT -Whole Word Masking model. This model provides word embeddings with semantic information. Then, the BNER process utilized an Improved Green Anaconda-assisted Bi-GRU-based Hierarchical ResNet BNER model (IGa-BiHR BNERM).
conclusionTo improve the training phase of the IGa-BiHR BNERM, the Improved Green Anaconda Optimization technique was used to select optimal weight parameter coefficients for training the model parameters. After the model was tested using the MACCROBAT dataset, it outperformed previous models with a tremendous accuracy rate of 99.11%. This model effectively and accurately identifies biomedical names within the text, significantly advancing this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.