Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885324›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integrating multiomics analysis and machine learning to refine the molecular subtyping and prognostic analysis of stomach adenocarcinoma.

Miaodong Wang, Qin He, Zeshan Chen, Yijue Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miaodong Wang *Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua, 321000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Qin He *Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua, 321000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Zeshan ChenDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 6 Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. chenzeshan12334@126.com.
Yijue QinDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 6 Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is a common malignancy with high heterogeneity and a lack of highly precise treatment options. We downloaded the multiomics data of STAD patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-STAD cohort, which included mRNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, somatic mutation, and DNA methylation data, from the sxdyc website. We synthesized the multiomics data of patients with STAD using 10 clustering methods, construct a consensus machine learning-driven signature (CMLS)-related prognostic models by combining 10 machine learning methods, and evaluated the prognosis models using the C-index. The prognostic relationship between CMLS and STAD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the independent prognostic value of CMLS was determined by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. we also evaluated the immune characteristics, immunotherapy response, and drug sensitivity of different CMLS groups. The results of the multiomics analysis classified STAD into three subtypes, with CS1 resulting in the best survival outcome. In total, 10 hub genes (CES3, AHCYL2, APOD, EFEMP1, CYP1B1, ASPN, CPE, CLIP3, MAP1B, and DKK1) were screened and constructed the CMLS was significantly correlated with prognosis in patients with STAD and was an independent prognostic factor for patients with STAD. Using the CMLS risk score, all patients were divided into a high CMLS group and a low CMLS group. Patients in the low-CMLS group had better survival, more enriched immune cells, and higher tumor mutation load scores, suggesting better immunotherapy responsiveness and a possible "hot tumor" phenotype. Patients in the high-CMLS group had a significantly poorer prognosis and were less sensitive to immunotherapy but were likely to benefit more from chemotherapy and targeted therapy. In this study, 10 clustering methods and 10 machine learning methods were combined to analyze the multiomics of STAD, classify STAD into three subtypes, and constructed CMLS-related prognostic model features, which are important for accurate management and effective treatment of STAD.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaMachine LearningStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedMultiomicsMutationPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsRNA, Long NoncodingImmunityMolecular subtypingMultiomicsPrognosisStomach adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39885324
PMCPMC11782604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.