Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885310›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025

Neonatology fellow assessment and evaluation: embracing the word salad of CBME, EPAs, and milestones.

Courtney McLean, Beverley Robin, Johannah M Scheurer, Kathryn E K Berlin, Megan M Gray, Deirdre O'Reilly, Heather French, Margarita M Vasquez, Mark Castera, Katherine M Redford and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Courtney McLeanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Beverley RobinDepartment of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8195-0080
Johannah M ScheurerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kathryn E K BerlinDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Megan M GrayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3272-9432
Deirdre O'ReillyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Heather FrenchDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Margarita M VasquezDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Mark CasteraDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine M RedfordDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Infants' Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Lindsay C JohnstonDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0428-0479
Patrick J MyersDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. pmyers@luriechildrens.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-5770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship training aims to educate fellows and enable them to move into successful independent neonatal practice. To reach this goal, every fellow must acquire a wide range of clinical, scholarly, and professional skills that require assessment and evaluation by the fellowship program. The assessment and evaluation of fellow progression and promotion must rely on a rigorous educational framework. The goal of this article is to illustrate the process of NPM fellow assessment and evaluation, introduce the educational framework utilized, describe challenges inherent to the process, and discuss opportunities to improve how NPM fellows are evaluated.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateFellowships and ScholarshipsNeonatologyHumansPerinatology

Identifiers

PMID39885310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.