ArticleScientific reports2025
A moisture differential technique for extraction and maintenance of imported fire ant colonies under laboratory conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Establishing and maintaining colonies of imported fire ants (IFA) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the laboratory are crucial for research. Dehydration is one of the major mortality factors in IFA, and the ants tend to relocate from dry to moist places. In our laboratory, we developed a moisture differential technique to extract fire ant colonies from mound materials. In this technique, the shoveled mound soil was dried by spreading in trays at room temperature. Standard glass test tubes half filled with water and plugged with cotton were placed in drying trays to provide a moist habitat. The gradual loss of moisture created a differential between the moist cotton in test tubes and drying soil in trays. Once the soil dried out, IFA moved from trays to moist cotton in the test tubes to avoid dehydration. All stages including the queens were successfully extracted using this technique. In a comparative study, this method recovered 52% more colony mass of hybrid fire ants than the standard water dripping method. Post separation colony survival was also significantly higher in this method as compared to the water dripping method. In addition to separating and maintaining IFA colonies, the moisture differential technique may have additional applications, especially in conducting behavioral bioassays where workers with active digging behavior are needed. Maintenance of laboratory colonies consisting of all life stages in plastic bottles using this new method mimics the field populations that are required to conduct behavioral bioassays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.