ArticleScientific reports2025
Hierarchical image classification using transfer learning to improve deep learning model performance for amazon parrots.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Underwater Computer Vision for Ecologists: A Framework for Curating Image Training Datasets for Object Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hyperparameter optimization to enhance the performance of deep learning models for the early detection of invasive turtles in Korea.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Enhancing occluded and standard bird object recognition using fuzzy-based ensembled computer vision approach with convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have proven the potential of deep learning models for classifying wildlife. Such models can reduce the workload of experts by automating species classification to monitor wild populations and global trade. Although deep learning models typically perform better with more input data, the available wildlife data are ordinarily limited, specifically for rare or endangered species. Recently, citizen science programs have helped accumulate valuable wildlife data, but such data is still not enough to achieve the best performance of deep learning models compared to benchmark datasets. Recent studies have applied the hierarchical classification of a given wildlife dataset to improve model performance and classification accuracy. This study applied hierarchical classification by transfer learning for classifying Amazon parrot species. Specifically, a hierarchy was built based on diagnostic morphological features. Upon evaluating model performance, the hierarchical model outperformed the non-hierarchical model in detecting and classifying Amazon parrots. Notably, the hierarchical model achieved the mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.944, surpassing the mAP of 0.908 achieved by the non-hierarchical model. Moreover, the hierarchical model improved classification accuracy between morphologically similar species. The outcomes of this study may facilitate the monitoring of wild populations and the global trade of Amazon parrots for conservation purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.