ArticleScientific reports2025
An artificial insurance framework for a hydrogen-based microgrid to detect the advanced cyberattack model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cyber attack and fault detection in DC microgrids by designing an event-triggered based-robust algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modeling, simulation, and optimization behavior of pharmaceutical compound removal from water in SR-AOPs technique for wastewater treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Resilient oscillator-based cyberattack detection for distributed secondary control of inverter-interfaced Islanded microgrids.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microgrid systems have evolved based on renewable energies including wind, solar, and hydrogen to make the satisfaction of loads far from the main grid more flexible and controllable using both island- and grid-connected modes. Albeit microgrids can gain beneficial results in cost and energy schedules once operating in grid-connected mode, such systems are vulnerable to malicious attacks from the viewpoint of cybersecurity. With this in mind, this paper explores a novel advanced attack model named the false transferred data injection (FTDI) attack aiming to manipulatively alter the power flowing from the microgrid to the upstream grid to raise voltage usability probability. One crucial piece of information that the model uses to change the system and cause the greatest amount of damage while concealing the attacker's view is the voltage stability index. Saying that the power transaction between the microgrid and the upstream grid is within the broad scope of bilateral exchange at any given moment is noteworthy. Put otherwise, with respect to the FTDI assault, the microgrid's power direction is just as significant to the detection system as the transferred power value. Therefore, once the microgrid is running in the grid-connected mode, the false data detector needs to concurrently detect changes in the value and direction of power. To overcome this problem, the paper presents a learning generative network model, based on the generative adversarial network (GAN) paradigm, to recognize the change in probability values that is maliciously aimed. To this end, a studied microgrid system including the wind turbine, photovoltaic, storage, tidal turbine, and fuel cell units is performed on the tested 24-bus IEEE grid to satisfy the local load demands. Comparative analysis indicates notable gains, such as scores of 0.95%, 0.92%, 0.7%, and 10% for the Hit rate, C.R. rate, F.A. rate, and Miss rate in order to evaluate the GAN-based detection model within the microgrid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.