Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885282›Full record

ReviewLab animal2025

A comparative review of murine models of repeated low-dose cisplatin-induced chronic kidney disease.

Hong-Wei Su, Cai-Wei Qiu

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hong-Wei SuDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Cai-Wei QiuResearch Center of Combine Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Prophylaxis and Treatment of Organ Fibrosis by Integrated Medicine of Luzhou Key Laboratory, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China. qiucaiwei@swmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8404-8241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Review evaluates various mouse and rat models of chronic kidney disease (CKD) that result from repeated low-dose cisplatin (RLDC) treatment while also discussing ethical considerations on the topic. Cisplatin can cause nephrotoxicity, and high doses of cisplatin can cause acute kidney injury. The RLDC regimen has been used in the treatment of solid organ cancers and has shown efficacy in reducing the occurrence of acute kidney injury in patients. However, prolonged treatments may lead to CKD. Mouse and rat models that effectively replicate the pathological features of CKD are invaluable for studying the mechanisms of the disease and exploring potential therapeutic interventions. Whereas administration of a single higher dose in some RLDC models may lead to higher mortality rates, a single lower dose may not replicate the fibrotic characteristics of CKD. Here we gathered information on mouse and rat models of RLDC-induced CKD and analyzed the impact of different variables, such as animal age, cisplatin dosage and administration frequency, on success rates, mortality rate and weight loss. Among the different models, weekly intraperitoneal administration of 8 mg/kg or 9 mg/kg of cisplatin for a total of 4 weeks in 12-week-old male C57BL/6 mice showed the most similar clinical characteristics of CKD while adhering to ethical requirements. In this Review, we suggest the best timings for both drug intervention and observation based on the biological traits of the model. Furthermore, given the limited research available on RLDC-induced CKD rat models, it is urgent to focus on developing RLDC methods that can induce detailed characteristics of CKD in rats.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDisease Models, AnimalRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.