ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating 36 years of fishing sustainability in a large reservoir.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various fishing activities are common economic practices in large hydroelectric reservoirs, such as Itaipu. Consequently, the Itaipu company has monitored artisanal commercial fishing since the formation of its reservoir. In this study, we used long-term monitoring data to evaluate the sustainability of this fishing activity in the Itaipu Reservoir, one of the largest reservoirs in the Neotropical region. Sustainability was evaluated by analyzing raw data patterns, evaluating species abundance distributions, building surplus production models, and forecasting biomass under different fishing scenarios. This evaluation spanned 36 years (1987-2022) and provided insights into 25 fish stocks. Additionally, we examined changes in stocks before and after 2000, coinciding with the construction of a fish pass and Porto Primavera Dam, a large upstream hydroelectric power plant. Our results show that, even after 40 years since the formation of the reservoir, biomass yields continue to decline, with fishing not being the primary cause, and certain stocks only being recorded after 2000. In 2022, we identified 12 fish stocks as sustainable, nine as recovering biomass, and four as overfished. We consider fishing in the Itaipu Reservoir to be currently sustainable, though concerns persist regarding the four overfished stocks and the decreasing biomass, which could pose future challenges for fishing activities in the reservoir. Additionally, the data suggests that even 40 years after the reservoir was formed, fish populations may not yet be stable in large reservoirs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.