ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025
The pulsatile brain, pulse pressure, cognition, and antihypertensive treatments in older adults: a functional NIRS study.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Glymphatic-Venous Axis in Brain Clearance Failure: Aquaporin-4 Dysfunction, Biomarker Imaging, and Precision Therapeutic Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cerebral pulsatility might be a driver of neurofunctional reorganization in the aging brain: an MRI and NIRS study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related arterial stiffness increases pulsatility that reaches the cerebral microcirculation, compromises cerebrovascular health and lead to cognitive decline. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) such as high blood pressure can exacerbate this effect. Despite extensive research on the impact of antihypertensive treatments on reducing arterial stiffness, little is known about the impact of antihypertensive treatments on pulsatility in cerebral microcirculation. This study investigated the impact of antihypertensive treatments on cerebral pulsatility and cognition in older adults with CVRFs. Participants were 42 older adults with diverse CVRFs in two groups of untreated (n = 21, mean 67.2 ± 5.9 years old, 57.1% female) and treated with antihypertensive medications (n = 21, mean 67.2 ± 5.5 years old, 61.1% female). Cognitive scores of processing speed and executive functions were evaluated behaviorally using the four subsets of the Stroop test. A near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) device recorded hemodynamics data from the frontal and motor cortex subregions. The data were then used to extract an optical index of cerebral pulsatility. Results indicated that after controlling for CVRFs, the antihypertensive treatment was associated with lower cerebral pulsatility (untreated 33.99 ± 6.68 vs. treated 28.88 ± 5.39 beats/min, p = 0.009). In both groups cerebral pulsatility was associated with pulse pressure (p < 0.05). Also, treated group had significantly higher cognitive scores in executive functions compared with the untreated group (p < 0.05). These results suggest that beyond its known effect on blood pressure, antihypertensive treatments might also favor cerebrovascular health by reducing pulsatility in the cerebral microcirculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39885275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.