ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the role of circulating proteins in multiple myeloma risk: a Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the role of circulating proteins in multiple myeloma risk: a Mendelian randomization study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable blood cancer with unclear aetiology. Proteomics is a valuable tool in exploring mechanisms of disease. We investigated the causal relationship between circulating proteins and MM risk, using two of the largest cohorts with proteomics data to-date. We performed bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR; forward MR = causal effect estimation of proteins and MM risk; reverse MR = causal effect estimation of MM risk and proteins). Summary statistics for plasma proteins were obtained from genome-wide association studies performed using SomaLogic (N = 35,559; deCODE) and Olink (N = 34,557; UK Biobank; UKB) proteomic platforms and for MM risk from a meta-analysis of UKB and FinnGen (case = 1649; control = 727,247) or FinnGen only (case = 1085; control = 271,463). Cis-SNPs associated with protein levels were used to instrument circulating proteins. We evaluated proteins for the consistency of directions of effect across MR analyses (with 95% confidence intervals not overlapping the null) and corroborating evidence from genetic colocalization. In the forward MR, 994 (SomaLogic) and 1570 (Olink) proteins were instrumentable. 440 proteins were analysed in both deCODE and UKB; 302 (69%) of these showed consistent directions of effect in the forward MR. Seven proteins had 95% confidence intervals (CIs) that did not overlap the null in both forward MR analyses and did not have evidence for an effect in the reverse direction: higher levels of dermatopontin (DPT), beta-crystallin B1 (CRYBB1), interleukin-18-binding protein (IL18BP) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (KDR) and lower levels of odorant-binding protein 2b (OBP2B), glutamate-cysteine ligase regulatory subunit (GCLM) and gamma-crystallin D (CRYGD) were implicated in increasing MM risk. Evidence from genetic colocalization did not meet our threshold for a shared causal signal between any of these proteins and MM risk (h4 < 0.8). Our results highlight seven circulating proteins which may be involved in MM risk. Although evidence from genetic colocalization suggests these associations may not be robust to the effects of horizontal pleiotropy, these proteins may be useful markers of MM risk. Future work should explore the utility of these proteins in disease prediction or prevention using proteomic data from patients with MM or precursor conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.