ArticleScientific reports2025
An optimized ensemble grey wolf-based pipeline for monkeypox diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HFSA: hybrid feature selection approach to improve medical diagnostic system.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the world recovered from the coronavirus, the emergence of the monkeypox virus signaled a potential new pandemic, highlighting the need for faster and more efficient diagnostic methods. This study introduces a hybrid architecture for automatic monkeypox diagnosis by leveraging a modified grey wolf optimization model for effective feature selection and weighting. Additionally, the system uses an ensemble of classifiers, incorporating confusion based voting scheme to combine salient data features. Evaluation on public data sets, at various of training samples percentages, showed that the proposed strategy achieves promising performance. Namely, the system yielded an overall accuracy of 98.91% with testing run time of 5.5 seconds, while using machine classifiers with small number of hyper-parameters. Additional experimental comparison reveals superior performance of the proposed system over literature approaches using various metrics. Statistical analysis also confirmed that the proposed AMDS outperformed other models after running 50 times. Finally, the generalizability of the proposed model is evaluated by testing its performance on external data sets for monkeypox and COVID-19. Our model achieved an overall diagnostic accuracy of 98.00% and 99.00% on external COVID and monkeypox data sets, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.