ArticleScientific reports2025
Noninvasive imaging biomarker reveals invisible microscopic variation in acute ischaemic stroke (≤ 24 h): a multicentre retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are AI Neuroimaging Models Ready for Clinical Use? A Systematic Methodological Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological conditions: a narrative review.Molecular brain · 2026Review
- Distinct visual biases affect humans and artificial intelligence in medical imaging diagnoses.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Bi-parametric MRI-based quantification radiomics model for the noninvasive prediction of histopathology and biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery: a multicenter study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT)-based radiomics method combines machine learning (ML) to investigate invisible microscopic acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) lesions. We retrospectively analyzed 1122 patients from August 2015 to July 2022, whose were later confirmed AIS by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). However, receiving a negative result was reported by radiologists according to the NCCT images. Patients in five institutions (n = 592) were combined to generate training and internal validation sets, remaining in three institutions as external validation sets (n = 204, 53 and 273). Through a series of procedures: head alignment, co-registration of NCCT and DWI, the volume of interest delineation and feature extraction. Multiple ML models (random forest, RF; support vector machine, SVM; logistic regression, LR; multilayer perceptron, MLP) were used to discriminate microscopic AIS and non-AIS. Among 1122 patients included (760 men [67.7%]; median [range] age, 64 [21-96] years). After least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm, 44 optimal features were remained. The radiomics combined ML models were yielded similar mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.808 (95% CI 0.754 to 0.861) for RF, 0.802 (95% CI 0.748 to 0.856) for radial basis kernel function-based SVM, 0.792 (95% CI 0.737 to 0.847) for MLP, 0.792 (95% CI 0.736 to 0.848) for Linear-SVM and 0.787 (95% CI 0.730 to 0.844) for LR, respectively. Combining radiomics with ML models can be an efficient, noninvasive, economical, and reliable technique for evaluating invisible microscopic AIS on NCCT and assisting radiologists to make clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.