ArticleScientific reports2025
An optimized lightweight real-time detection network model for IoT embedded devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Object detection on low-compute edge SoCs: a reproducible benchmark and deployment guidelines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sugarcane stem node detection with algorithm based on improved YOLO11 channel pruning with small target enhancement.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) technology, embedded devices in various computer vision scenarios can realize real-time target detection and recognition tasks, such as intelligent manufacturing, automatic driving, smart home, and so on. YOLOv8, as an advanced deep learning model in the field of target detection, has attracted much attention for its excellent detection speed, high precision, and multi-task processing capability. However, since IoT embedded devices typically own limited computing resources, direct deployment of YOLOv8 is a big challenge, especially for real-time detection tasks. To address this vital issue, this work proposes and deploys an optimized lightweight real-time detection network model that well-suits for IoT embedded devices, denoted as FRYOLO. To evaluate its performance, a case study based on real-time fresh and defective fruit detection in the production line is performed. Characterized by low training cost and high detection performance, this model accurately detects various types of fruits and their states, as the experimental results show that FRYOLO achieves 84.7% in recall and 89.0% in mean Average Precision (mAP), along with a precision of 92.5%. In addition, it provides a detection frame rate of up to 33 Frames Per Second (FPS), satisfying the real-time requirement. Finally, an intelligent production line system based on FRYOLO is implemented, which not only provides robust technical support for the efficient operation of fruit production processes but also demonstrates the availability of the proposed network model in practical IoT applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.