Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885206›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Machine learning-enhanced high-resolution exposure assessment of ultrafine particles.

Yudie Jianyao, Hongyong Yuan, Guofeng Su, Jing Wang, Wenguo Weng, Xiaole Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yudie Jianyao *School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Hongyong Yuan *School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Guofeng SuSchool of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jing WangInstitute of Environmental Engineering (IfU), ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-137X
Wenguo WengSchool of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0834-8338
Xiaole ZhangSchool of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. zhangxiaole@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8349-8101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) under 100 nm pose significant health risks inadequately addressed by traditional mass-based metrics. The WHO emphasizes particle number concentration (PNC) for assessing UFP exposure, but large-scale evaluations remain scarce. In this study, we developed a stacking-based machine learning framework integrating data-driven and physical-chemical models for a national-scale UFP exposure assessment at 1 km spatial and 1-hour temporal resolutions, leveraging long-term standardized PNC measurements in Switzerland. Approximately 20% (1.7 million) of the Swiss population experiences high UFP exposure exceeding an annual mean of 10

Identifiers

PMID39885206
PMCPMC11782512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.