ArticleScientific reports2025
Proteomic insights into dual-species biofilm formation of E. coli and E. faecalis on urinary catheters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Metagenomic sequencing enables accurate pathogen and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling in complicated UTIs in approximately four hours.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Characterizing interactions of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in dual-species implant-associated biofilms.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- CGRP, PD-1 and PD-L1 as Biomarkers for PICC-Related Bloodstream Infections in Breast Cancer Patients.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infections associated with urinary catheters are often caused by biofilms composed of various bacterial species that form on the catheters' surfaces. In this study, we investigated the intricate interplay between Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis during biofilm formation on urinary catheter segments using a dual-species culture model. We analyzed biofilm formation and global proteomic profiles to understand how these bacteria interact and adapt within a shared environment. Our findings demonstrated dynamic population shifts within the biofilms, with E. coli initially thriving in the presence of E. faecalis, then declining during biofilm development. E. faecalis exhibited a rapid decrease in cell numbers after 48 h in both single- and dual-species biofilms. Interestingly, the composition of the dual-species biofilms was remarkably diverse, with some predominantly composed of E. coli or of E. faecalis; others showed a balanced ratio of both species. Notably, elongated E. faecalis cells were observed in dual-species biofilms, a novel finding in mixed-species biofilm cultures. Proteomic analysis revealed distinct adaptive strategies E. coli and E. faecalis employed within biofilms. E. coli exhibited a more proactive response, emphasizing motility, transcription, and protein synthesis for biofilm establishment; whereas E. faecalis displayed a more reserved strategy, potentially downregulating metabolic activity, transcription, and translation in response to cohabitation with E. coli. Both E. coli and E. faecalis displayed significant downregulation of virulence-associated proteins when coexisting in dual-species biofilms. By delving deeper into these dynamics, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of challenging biofilm-associated infections, paving the way for novel strategies to combat them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.