Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885116›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025

Improving explainability of post-separation suicide attempt prediction models for transitioning service members: insights from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers - Longitudinal Study.

Emily R Edwards, Joseph C Geraci, Sarah M Gildea, Claire Houtsma, Jacob A Holdcraft, Chris J Kennedy, Andrew J King, Alex Luedtke, Brian P Marx, James A Naifeh and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emily R EdwardsVISN 2 MIRECC, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bronx, NY, USA.
Joseph C GeraciVISN 2 MIRECC, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bronx, NY, USA.
Sarah M GildeaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Claire HoutsmaSoutheast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jacob A HoldcraftDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Chris J KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew J KingDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alex LuedtkeDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian P MarxNational Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-1796
James A NaifehDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-3054
Nancy A SampsonDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Murray B SteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9564-2871
Robert J UrsanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-9173
Ronald C KesslerDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. kessler@hcp.med.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-2305

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense (United States Department of Defense) HU0001-15-2-0004U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs) Project SPR-002-24F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk of U.S. Army soldier suicide-related behaviors increases substantially after separation from service. As universal prevention programs have been unable to resolve this problem, a previously reported machine learning model was developed using pre-separation predictors to target high-risk transitioning service members (TSMs) for more intensive interventions. This model is currently being used in a demonstration project. The model is limited, though, in two ways. First, the model was developed and trained in a relatively small cross-validation sample (n = 4044) and would likely be improved if a larger sample was available. Second, the model provides no guidance on subtyping high-risk TSMs. This report presents results of an attempt to refine the model to address these limitations by re-estimating the model in a larger sample (n = 5909) and attempting to develop embedded models for differential risk of post-separation stressful life events (SLEs) known to mediate the association of model predictions with post-separation nonfatal suicide attempts (SAs; n = 4957). Analysis used data from the Army STARRS Longitudinal Surveys. The revised model improved prediction of post-separation SAs in the first year (AUC = 0.85) and second-third years (AUC = 0.77) after separation, but embedded models could not predict post-separation SLEs with enough accuracy to support intervention targeting.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMilitary PersonnelResilience, PsychologicalSuicide, AttemptedAdultFemaleHumansLife Change EventsLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39885116
PMCPMC11782477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.