ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025
A comparative methodological approach for argan forest classification using Landsat imagery.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transition of blue space in the urban area of khulna city corporation using geospatial and machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decades, natural and anthropogenic pressures have caused observable changes in the argan landscape despite its significance in Morocco. Remote sensing data can be used to monitor these changes over time and provide information on vegetation health and land cover changes. This study assesses the performance of supervised methods (support vector machine, maximum likelihood, and minimum distance) and unsupervised classification method (Isodata) for mapping the argan forest in the Smimou area of Essaouira province using remote sensing data from Landsat-5 and Landsat-8 (1985 and 2019). Additionally, the impact of the resampling method and the digital elevation model (DEM) integration on the classification results have been examined. The ground truth data were collected and randomly divided into two categories: 234 samples to calibrate the classification algorithms and 340 samples for validation. Maximum likelihood supervised classification achieved an overall accuracy (OA) of 89.62% (kappa = 0.84) and 87.58% (kappa = 0.81) in 1985 and 2019, respectively. Using resampling techniques on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) products, aiming for a 10 m resolution, the NDVI results yielded an OA of 91.60% in 1985 and 88.85% in 2019. Further integration of DEM (30-m resolution) with NDVI, which was resampled to a 10 m resolution, achieved an OA of 92.27% and 92.37% for 1985 and 2019, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.