Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885019›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Natural Products Analysis Through Time: From Past Achievements to Future Prospects.

Robert Verpoorte, Hye Kyong Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert VerpoorteNatural Products Lab, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. verpoort@chem.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6180-1424
Hye Kyong KimNatural Products Lab, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This introductory chapter traces the evolution of (bio)chemical assays, emphasizing the critical role of robust protocols in ensuring reproducibility-a fundamental aspect of scientific research. With the advent of systems biology, the need for standardized methods has intensified, particularly for integrating vast datasets in open-access formats. The historical progression from basic plant morphology to advanced chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques in phytochemistry highlights the necessity for precise, reproducible protocols.As metabolomics advances, there is a renewed focus on targeted approaches, shifting from broad, untargeted analyses to more specific, hypothesis-driven studies. This chapter also explores the future of analytical techniques, including cellomics and real-time metabolic flux measurements, which offer new insights into dynamic biochemical processes.Ultimately, this introduction underscores the importance of innovation in developing new methods that address current scientific challenges, particularly in pharmacognosy and analytical phytochemistry. The chapter sets the stage for the broader discussion on the necessity of well-designed protocols that facilitate effective data sharing and collaboration across research disciplines.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsMetabolomicsPlantsBiological ProductsChromatographyIntroductionNecessityProtocolsSpectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39885019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.