Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39884807›Full record

ReviewDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2025

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of small molecules: How much progress have we made?

Nina Isoherranen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nina IsoherranenDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: ni2@uw.edu.

Funding

Understanding Fetal Exposure to Cannabinoids Through In Vitro and In Vivo StudiesP01DA032507 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI UNADKAT, JASHVANT D · 2013 to 2023
$12.4M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA032507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of small molecules have become mainstream in drug development and in academic research. The use of PBPK models is continuously expanding, with the majority of work now focusing on predictions of drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and changes in drug disposition across lifespan. Recently, publications that use PBPK modeling to predict drug disposition during pregnancy and in organ impairment have increased reflecting the advances in incorporating diverse physiologic changes into the models. Because of the expanding computational power and diversity of modeling platforms available, the complexity of PBPK models has also increased. Academic efforts have provided clear advances in better capturing human physiology in PBPK models and incorporating more complex mathematical concepts into PBPK models. Examples of such advances include the segregated gut model with a series of gut compartments allowing modeling of physiologic blood flow distribution within an organ and zonation of metabolic enzymes and series compartment liver models allowing simulations of hepatic clearance for high extraction drugs. Despite these advances in academic research, the progress in assessing model quality and defining model acceptance criteria based on the intended use of the models has not kept pace. This Minireview suggests that awareness of the need for predefined criteria for model acceptance has increased, but many manuscripts still lack description of scientific justification and/or rationale for chosen acceptance criteria. As artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches become more broadly accepted, these tools offer promise for development of comprehensive assessment for existing observed data and analysis of model performance. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has become a mainstream application in academic literature and is broadly used for predictions, analysis, and evaluation of pharmacokinetic data. Significant progress has been made in developing advanced PBPK models that better capture human physiology, but oftentimes sufficient justification for the chosen model acceptance criterion and model structure is still missing. This Minireview provides a summary of the current landscape of PBPK applications used and highlights the need for advancing PBPK modeling science and training in academia.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPharmacokineticsAnimalsComputer SimulationDrug DevelopmentDrug InteractionsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsTissue DistributionPharmaceutical PreparationsIn vitro to in vivo predictionsMechanistic modelsModel verificationPharmacokineticsPhysiologically based

Identifiers

PMID39884807
PMCPMC13021368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.