ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Continuous individual feedback to nurses at emergency medical dispatch centres: a stepped-wedge, interrupted time series analysis.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical feedback is often lacking in prehospital care, and while performance data is increasingly available to clinical and operational leadership, it is seldom made available to care providers themselves. In this study, we investigate the impact of a simple intervention consisting of the provision of monthly feedback reports via email to emergency medical dispatch nurses in three Swedish regions.
methodIndividualised reports consisting of 14 measures divided into descriptive (eg, priority-setting and call times), process (eg, dispatch times and documentation completeness) and outcome (eg, over/under triage rate) categories were developed with staff and management input. Report delivery was implemented using a stepped-wedge design, and effects were evaluated using a hierarchical regression-based interrupted time series analysis.
results40 dispatchers were included in the study between March 2020 and October 2023, who handled a total of 246 353 incidents. Some impacts on documentation-related process measures were identified, with the odds of complete documentation increasing by 7.5% (95% CI 5.1 to 9.9) and the odds of having a documented contact reason increasing by 3.8% (1.5-5.9). These effects remained robust over the post-intervention period. Weaker impacts on outcome measures were identified which could be explained by a higher priority given to emergency medical dispatches overall.
conclusionProviding performance data can influence care providers to adjust their behaviour to improve process-related quality metrics under their direct control. The intervention may also have induced nurses to more often upgrade the priority of their patients. Improving outcome metrics may however require more intensive, multifaceted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.