ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2025
Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in intermediate-risk emergency department patients with abnormal high-sensitivity troponin.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain often have abnormal high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn). However, only about 5% have an acute coronary syndrome. We aimed to assess the safety, feasibility, and utility of a clinical disposition protocol, including outpatient observation with stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in intermediate-risk patients with abnormal hsTn of unclear etiology.
methodsPatients with abnormal hsTn and modified HEART-score ≤6 underwent CMR to inform diagnosis, risk stratification, and ED disposition. Patients were followed at 30 and 90 days for all-cause mortality, readmission for myocardial infarction, and unplanned coronary revascularization.
resultsCMR was completed in 50 patients (64 years, 56% male) at a median of 23.2 h after presentation to the ED. CMR findings of coronary artery disease (CAD) were present in 19 (38%, 19/50) of patients, of which 13 had known CAD and 6 received a new diagnosis of CAD. In 12 (24%, 12/50) patients, cardiac noncoronary artery disease was diagnosed [cardiomyopathy (8), valvular disease (3), and myocarditis/pericarditis (1)], of which the majority (83%) (10/12) were new diagnoses. CMR was normal in 19 (38%, 19/50) patients. After CMR results were reported, the decision to admit was made in 10 (20%, 10/50) patients, while 40 (80%, 40/50) were discharged from the ED without further cardiac testing. Follow-up was completed in 96% (48/50) of patients, of which no patients experienced an adverse event.
conclusionA disposition protocol with outpatient observation and stress CMR is feasible and useful for determining the etiology of myocardial injury and risk stratification in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain, abnormal hsTn, and intermediate risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.