Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39884187›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2025

Intracalvariosseous injection: an approach for central nervous system drug delivery through skull bone marrow with a preclinical research in stroke.

Wenqian Liu, Mo Yang, Nanxing Wang, Xiangrong Liu, Chaoyu Wang, Kaibin Shi, Fu-Dong Shi, Yuesong Pan, Mingjun Zhang, Zhiwei Sun and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Immunotherapy in central nervous system tumors.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wenqian LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mo YangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Nanxing WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiangrong LiuChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Chaoyu WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kaibin ShiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Fu-Dong ShiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yuesong PanChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Mingjun ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhiwei SunLaboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yilong WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China; National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing, China; Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China; Beijing Laboratory of Oral Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: yilong528@aliyun.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) accessibility constitutes a major hurdle for drug development to treat neurological diseases. Existing drug delivery methods rely on breaking the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for drugs to penetrate the CNS. Researchers have discovered natural microchannels between the skull bone marrow and the dura mater, providing a pathway for drug delivery through the skull bone marrow. However, there has been no research on the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this delivery method for drug treatment of stroke.

methodsWe used a microporous method for intracalvariosseous (ICO) injection to deliver drugs directly into brain parenchyma through skull bone marrow. Safety of ICO was assessed by monitoring changes in skull and peripheral blood neutrophil counts, and FITC-dextran extravasation across the BBB. Drug delivery pathways were observed through transparent skull-dura mater-brain tissue. In a rodent stroke model, NA-1 or Y-3 neuroprotective agents were administered via ICO to evaluate safety and efficacy by assessing neurological deficits, infarct size, neuroinflammatory factors, neuronal apoptosis, and liver/kidney function. Drug concentration in tissues was measured using fluorescence tracing and high-performance liquid chromatography to gauge ICO delivery efficiency.

findingsICO injection delivers drugs to the brain parenchyma through microchannels between the skull bone marrow and the dura mater, offering higher delivery efficiency than intravenous injection. After ICO injection, there were no changes in neutrophil counts in the skull bone marrow and peripheral blood, and the amount of FITC-dextran passing through the BBB remained unchanged. This confirmed that ICO injection does not cause skull infection or break BBB, which suggested ICO injection is safe and feasible. In the treatment of stroke with neuroprotective agents, although the drug dosage of ICO injection was lower than intravenous injection, drug accumulation in the brain increased after ICO injection, which helped repair nerve damage, reduce neuronal apoptosis, and decrease the expression of inflammatory factors.

interpretationICO injection is a central nervous system drug delivery method that utilizes natural microchannels between the skull and dura mater for efficient drug delivery. Our results assessed the feasibility and safety of ICO injection at the preclinical level and evaluated its efficacy in animal models of stroke. The findings provided a foundation for the clinical translation of ICO injection.

fundingThis study was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82425101); Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (No. Z231100004823036); Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (2022-2-2045); National Key Research & Development Program of China (2022YFF1501500, 2022YFF1501501, 2022YFF1501502, 2022YFF1501503, 2022YFF1501504, 2022YFF1501505).

Indexed as

Bone MarrowDrug Delivery SystemsNeuroprotective AgentsSkullStrokeAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceRatsNeuroprotective AgentsBlood-brain-barrierDrug deliveryMicrochannelsSkull bone marrowStroke

Identifiers

PMID39884187
PMCPMC11830332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.