Trial reportBlood advances2025
Six-month rituximab-lenalidomide regimen in advanced untreated follicular lymphoma: SAKK 35/10 trial 10-year update.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Follicular Lymphoma: Novel Therapies and Strategies for Optimal Therapeutic Sequencing.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the Nordic Lymphoma Group conducted the SAKK 35/10 randomized phase 2 trial to compare rituximab (R) alone vs R plus lenalidomide (L) as initial treatment for follicular lymphoma (FL). Patients with grade 1 to 3A FL, requiring systemic therapy, were randomized to either R (n = 77; 375 mg/m2 IV × 1, weeks 1-4) or rituximab-lenalidomide (RL) (n = 77; R on the same schedule and L at 15 mg daily continuously). Responders (evaluated at 10 weeks) repeated R during weeks 12 to 15 with or without L (for a total of 18 weeks). Both arms had 47% of patients with a poor risk score on the FL International Prognostic Index. The primary end point, complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed rates at 6 months, was superior with the combination, and after a median follow-up of 9.5 years, this has translated into a longer duration of response (median, not reached vs 3.2 years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.86; P = .014), progression-free survival (9.3 vs 2.3 years; HR, 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37-0.89; P = .0128), and time to next treatment (median, not reached vs 2.1 years; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.67; P < .001). Over 60% of RL responders remained in first CR at 10 years. Overall survival was similar in both arms (77% vs 78% at 10 years; P = .881). Toxicity was more common with RL but manageable. The SAKK 35/10 trial's long-term results confirmed a durable benefit of a short-term chemotherapy-free first-line RL regimen in symptomatic FL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT0137605.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.