SynthesisBlood advances2025
Impact of vein-to-vein time in patients with R/R LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The carbon footprint of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cell manufacturing processes.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Bone Marrow Cell Therapies for Cardiac Repair: Integrating Gene Therapy and Bioengineering to Enhance Therapeutic Potency.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Comparative effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy versus historical controls in patients with relapse/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma: An indirect treatment comparison in the real-world setting.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Article
- Cancer Immunotherapy: Therapeutic Limitations and Next-Generation Precision Strategies.Immune network · 2026Review
- Drivers of temporal improvement in CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: a Japanese nationwide registry analysis.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Locally manufacturedHaematologica · 2026Article
- From production to bedside: A tiered QC framework for regulatory alignment and analytical comparability in decentralized CGT.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Willingness to Pay for Treatment Attributes in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Japan.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Challenges and advances in CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Zamtocabtagene autoleucel: dual CD20-CD19 targeting for NHL.Blood advances · 2026Article
- In vivo generation of anti-BCMA CAR-T cells in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1 study.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel for large B-cell lymphoma in the UK.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Redefining cell therapy: CAR-engineered innate immune cells to conquer solid and hematologic malignancies.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Engineering CAR-T cells for solid tumors: Overcoming the microenvironment through integrated design and clinical translation.Oncoscience · 2026Review
- Access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Prolonged chimeric antigen receptor-T apheresis to infusion time is associated with inferior outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Article
- Cancer immunotherapy insights: key takeaways from the ADSCC bone marrow and cellular therapy congress 2024.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) are approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Emerging evidence indicates that delayed CAR T-cell infusion, including prolonged time from leukapheresis to infusion, known as vein-to-vein time (V2Vt), may adversely impact clinical outcomes. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis to identify differences in V2Vt in patients with R/R LBCL treated with axi-cel, tisa-cel, or liso-cel. The impact of V2Vt (<28 days vs ≥28 to <40 days vs ≥40 days) on effectiveness and safety outcomes was evaluated in patients treated with axi-cel enrolled in a post-authorization safety study using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data. SLR and meta-analysis showed that patients treated with axi-cel had the shortest median V2Vt (30.6 days) compared with tisa-cel (48.4 days) or liso-cel (35.9 days). Real-world analysis of patients treated with axi-cel demonstrated that V2Vt ≥40 days was associated with significantly lower complete response rate than V2Vt <28 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.61) or ≥28 to <40 days (OR, 0.66) and significantly worse overall survival than V2Vt <28 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33) or ≥28 to <40 days (HR, 1.36). Higher prolonged thrombocytopenia rates were observed in patients with axi-cel V2Vt ≥28 to <40 days or ≥40 days compared with <28 days (OR, 1.44 or 1.95, respectively). Together, these results show the impact of V2Vt on patient outcomes with axi-cel therapy and that earlier infusion with CD19-CAR therapies may be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.